Two insiders, mainly engaged in the sphere of cinema, said at once, said that the authors The Last of Us: Part III The shooting with actors to capture movements is already being prepared. Also, a list of new characters in the series was included in the network.
Famous for Plums about projects on Marvel comics and DC insider Daniel Richtman (Daniel Richtman), also known under the nickname Danielrpk, published a little information about the continuation of the game franchise The Last of Us.
A group of survivors will appear in the new part, which lives on the outskirts of the destroyed city and uses a house built in the Victorian style as a base.
Mason is a former military man who must choose between his fidelity Ezra and the well-being of the group, when Val is accused of something.
Lucas is a friendly young man who is trying to establish relations with another member of the group and opens his not better side.
Another insider, known as Viewranon, confirmed this information and stated that filming with actors would begin this year. He also said that Ellie will appear in the game and she will be given as much time as in Part II.
Official information about the development of a game continuation The Last of Us Not yet. But in Naughty Dog They have repeatedly stated that they could do trickery if the team comes up with an exciting story.
July 3, 2023 Selected servers and the fight against cheaters – development plans of Battlebit Remastered
July 4, 2023 The source code of the original far crry was leaked to the network
The Last of Us: Part II
The best comments
By the way, here the people are bombing in vain at the expense of Leva, he is not a trans at all (in the ordinary understanding of the majority). There, the “sex change” is determined precisely by the social role – the desire to become a warrior. The sexual side has never been raised. But judging by your tonality, it will be too difficult to understand.
Ezra – hardly. It is written:
So he will be a typical evil man-navel.
Val is a woman and leader of the survivors.
Ezra is a man who wants to seize power in the house and shift Val.
Well, how else – an evil stupid spermobak wants to shift a strong, smart and independent woman.
So with a probability of 99% will be so. Or there are doubts?
Leo could be perceived as you say. That is, as a girl who wants to become a warrior. BUT:
1. The breeds themselves do not follow their own Laura
As far as I remember, in the game itself every second warrior of scars is a woman.
That is, the developers prescribe an ENT in words to us, but in fact this ENT in their game is not respected by them. If the position of women of scars is such that they cannot be warriors, then where do so many women-warriors on the locations of the game?
A more competent justification would sound “I do not want to be a litter of the head of the community, I do not want to turn my body into a maternity ward”. But there are questions.
Firstly, the outfits have been pushing precisely on the fact that Leo was overwhelmed and renamed the boy, because he wants to be a warrior, not a woman.
Secondly, no matter how Nonukcasinosites.co.uk/review/xl-casino/ trite it sounds, but being the wife of the head of the community is a great honor and great power. If you are so valuable with your struggle with the unfair laws of society, then it would not be bad to lead this society and change the laws. It would be the right struggle. And do not kill compatriots with shouts "Yanetakusik". The stories that the wife of the head of the community in the life of the community does not solve anything – we leave the children. An adult understands that the Pipure of the Head of the Community is a non -such lever of power. Khalisi will not let you lie. The main thing is that the husband remains alive.
But that’s not all. Let’s go further on the list.
2. The scars are matriarchy. How a lion can be infringed?
Scars actually obey the woman. All of their ENT says that the scars of matriarchy.
What exactly does not suit Leo? She is infringed like a woman? In matriarchy? Seriously?
3. The division of the duties of the community into male warriors and women of women are historically justified
The historical analogy says that the division of labor and social roles between women and men was justified. This was necessary for society to survive.
In the setting of the post -apocalypse, there are two tasks before any community – hunting and protecting the house, providing food and birth rate.
Refining the level of TLOU and TLOU2 throws humanity far back and puts in conditions akin to the conditions of ancient tribes.
In ancient tribes, men were hunters and warriors, and women collectors, engaged in a home, gave birth and raised children.
And this was invented not because "blah blah blah patriarchate, oppression of women". This was invented because not to survive otherwise.
I understand that everyone likes beautiful stories about bold Amazons, who did not need men at all. The children of strangers were stolen, raised, everything – that’s the replenishment of the community.
In fact, the existence and welfare of such a community of the Amazons will be under a big question, and someone needs to give birth to children so that the Amazons can then steal.
Therefore, the topic with the Amazons immediately aside.
And in the average post -apocalyptic society, as in the society of ancient tribes, you need to continue the genus, moreover, you need to give birth a lot. The aging of the nation ancient tribes could not afford. There were unacceptable conversations in the style of “We want to live for ourselves for ten years, and then we can have one child, or maybe we will have enough a cat with a dog”.
If a woman gives birth, then for at least a year she cannot engage in any military fishing. It is necessary to recover after childbirth, you need to constantly ensure that the child did not crawl into the mouth to the hungry wolf.
Accordingly, even if a woman wants to be a warrior, she will constantly fall out of the military training cycle for the period of pregnancy. She will lose the skill of a warrior over and over again. And after childbirth and pregnancy, she will need to recall the forgotten skills again, learn new, restore the body and prepare it for battles.
Those who have more chances to win in battle: the detachment in the nature of stronger men who learn to shoot, cut, beat, put traps from the diapers, or the detachment of women who have just returned to the battlefield after pregnancy?
Therefore, this does not look wrong that the scars on the ENT of a man is a warriors, and women keep the hearth and raise children.
3. The inner drama of the lion does not work, this is just another non -takushik.
Leo is an absolutely idiotic character, the addition of which turns history and drama into a stupid farce.
As I said, it does not look wrong that the scars on the ENT of a man of a warrior, and women keep the hearth and raise children.
It looks wrong that a small idiot who imagines herself is not like everyone else, goes against the foundations of society, which is why her single-players are dying. After all, without a twinge of conscience, she kills her, reveals their secret lazes to enemies, in fact she is engaged in sabotage and murder of fellow tribesmen.
Her sister dies because of her. After all, it was Leo that is to blame for the fact that the sister at first lost her hand, and then died. It was Leo on emotions that constantly flew into the mouth of death, from where she had time to get her sister, then Abby, who was not at all in business.
Because of her, the beloved of Abby and his pregnant wife died, because if Abby had not rushed behind Leo to the Shramov camp, then Ellie could not get to Ebby’s lover, in extreme cases, Abby would be nearby and could at least fight for the one he loves while he was alive.
And here it already turns out that Abby is a fool. She knows that all members of her detachment are hunting an unknown group (Ellie and Co.). Warry scars everywhere, the fighting with which in the peak itself. And now the allies – dogs (wolves) – also hunt with Abby and members of her team, because Abby is now a traitor.
And it is at such a difficult, most dangerous moment that you need to leave your lover with his pregnant wife, with whom you have been surviving your shoulder to shoulder for decades, and rushing to save the girl’s girl, which you know only a couple of days.
Lev also killed her mother, albeit fanatical, but still mother. She herself rushed to her mother, knowing that she was very fanatical, and she killed her herself. Let it be self -defense, but it is such self -defense when you fly to your potential killer in your hands, provoking this person, and then kill your killer – pure self -defense. I think that any modern court would have said in the decision.
4. Leo history is precisely the statement of the authors, a symbol of the struggle.
Why was introduced into the story of a lion?
The story of Leo and Abby clearly gives an analogy to the history of Joel and Ellie, but this is some kind of crooked mirror. Ellie, like Joel, were not perfect. Ellie in places is also a fool, like a lion, because only the fool will be with his lover girlfriend to chat at night in the premises full of zombies (as was shown in the addition to the first TLOU).
But the level of Leo Ellie is very far away.
One would think that we are deliberately showed by growing up a naive hysterical child Leo, such as the character to change then.
But firstly, lion is not a child, she is not four years old. Thirteen years old by the standards of the post -post TLOU is already a very adult conscious age. Not everyone lives to such years. And in the realities of scars is generally difficult to imagine that such a child lives up to 13 years. She would either in a fit of another “childish” hysteria would jump into the mouth of the zombie, or under a bullet of the dogs, or they cut her own, showing hedally on a pole at an earlier age.
Secondly, we will not present the actions of the lion, as unacceptable and negative. No one scolds her for such behavior. Everything looks like a lion does everything right. This society is wrong, because let society burn with a bright flame, and the lion can only be praised.
The story of Leo is precisely the statement.
Read any wiki on TLOU2 and there they write “Leo – He”, which is also intentionally done by developers.
Leo is a symbol of the struggle of non -bureau, a symbol of modern struggle. But the modern struggle of non -bureaucracy does not join the realities of scars from TLOU2.
In addition, as a symbol, it is necessary to put a character of a positive, or a character that becomes positive, or in extreme cases of a character of charismatic.
And the lion does not possess these qualities. This is not a handsome bob from a rock-nerler.
Personally, I adore symbolism in works, but the lion is a bad symbol.
And the reward for the most attracted for ears is a shades for the film/book/game … BoneBlass!
